The Fallacy of BCG’s Perspective on Industry 4.0

This morning I got up and found an email from BCG in which I discovered that this article on Industry 4.0 is one of the most read. The article and its facetious nature ticked me off a little bit and prompted me to write this. The article might as well have been written to see how many buzzwords can be stuffed into a high sounding paper. Worse would be to find that a large number of people are impressed by this paper.

The misconception starts right in the first paragraph.

The steam engine powered factories in the nineteenth century, electrification led to mass production in the early part of the twentieth century, and industry became automated in the 1970s. In the decades that followed, however, industrial technological advancements were only incremental, especially compared with the breakthroughs that transformed IT, mobile communications, and e-commerce.

To the authors: Toyota Production System, one of the most important innovations in manufacturing in recent decades, was developed, fine-tuned and broadly adopted in the 1970s and beyond.

The next paragraph is even more egregious in its use of bloviation and exaggeration.

Now let’s look at the nine foundational technologies selected by BCG that make up Industry 4.0 transformation.

Big Data and Analytics

Statistics arrived on the scene a good hundred years before “Big Data and Analytics”. Manufacturing companies have been using statistics with and without big data for several decades now. I do believe that advanced techniques such as Machine Learning have an increasingly role to play in manufacturing. But Big Data and Analytics is not as ground shaking as the article suggests as far as manufacturing is concerned. These are many fancy use cases around Predictive Quality using Big Data (analyzing all data that is), but more often than not Source Inspection and  Poka-yoke strategies are better.

Besides and in many cases a simpler approach is often faster and cheaper than the big data approach as can seen in this post.

 Autonomous Robots

This is Elon Musk’s biggest fear. Imagine autonomous robots attain consciousness, communicate and go on strike.

 

Simulation

I have no idea what the authors are talking about here. CAD/CAM/CAE and discrete event simulation have been around for decades and have been used extensively in manufacturing domains. What about SMED?

That said simulation of complex systems (integrated mechanical, electronics and communications systems) continues to be devilishly difficult and advances in this area can help design, development and manufacture of intelligent products.

Horizontal and Vertical Integration

Companies have been attempting cross-functional engineering for decades now. It’s been hard to accomplish because of human nature and tools provided by vendors suck.

Vertical integration and its practice is dependent on company’s core competencies, market dynamics and how much control a company wants to have in the value chain.

Industrial Internet of Things

Less said the better. Because in a couple of years IoT and IIOT will cease to exist. Most people will instead talk in terms of connected products, experiences and intelligent machines/manufacturing systems

Cybersecurity

Security is a defensive measure. How does that transform manufacturing and make it better and more productive?

Cloud

I am not sure why this is even listed.

Additive Manufacturing

Finally. This is a valid technology that has the potential to transform certain segments of manufacturing. Some of the most exciting work is being done with next generation materials (nano-materials) that are ideally suited for additive manufacturing.

Augmented Reality (AR)

AR is certainly an exciting and transformational technology for games and you know what. The authors also correctly note that AR can be transformational in product development, training and service. But before that happens it has to be cheap, good and easy to adopt. It’s not there yet.

Overall, the Industry 4.0 paper lacks intellectual rigor that is expected of a BCG paper. It has taken an unwarranted and excessive technology slant and failed to take into consideration other essential aspects, including new materials, new manufacturing processes, transportation trends, regional economic and human resource trends and geopolitics.

Kris Gorrepati

My 2 cents on Supply Chain Management, Manufacturing, Design, New Product Development, Software Engineering, and related topics.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *